Human review policy

The model warns.
A person decides.

Consequential decisions require source context, provenance checks, model limitations and a documented reviewer rationale.

Open the free checker

Scope before score.

Every result is a warning signal. The evidence and limitations below define what this route can and cannot support.

Triage

Use the signal to prioritize what to inspect next, not to establish origin.

Decision

Record disclose, no disclosure, reject or recheck with a reason tied to the complete evidence dossier.

Correction

Allow suppliers and affected people to provide source evidence, challenge the result and request re-review.

Do not infer more than the lane measured.

  • No automatic accusation, penalty, rejection or publication block.
  • Reviewers need lane-specific guidance and escalation paths.
  • High-stakes use requires legal, fairness and domain-specific assessment.

Continue with evidence

False positivesRead more →Provenance workflowRead more →30-day pilotRead more →